Archive for August, 2006

Real Men Don’t Ask Directions


01 Aug

A good illustration of alternative modes of ‘direction-seeking behavior’ comes courtesy of Douglas Adams’ private investigator Dirk Gently who, in


“Long Dark Tea Time of the Soul” (Douglas Adams)

explains the method he uses to find his way when he gets lost. His technique involves finding a car that looks like it knows where it’s going and following it. Gently says “I rarely end up where I was intending to go, but I often end up somewhere that I needed to be”. I sometimes employ this same technique. I also find that, when there are a number of cars on the road, I will decide in favor of the direction in which a majority of them are headed.

This behavior can be observed well outside the realm of automobile travel. In research I often find myself following the research trail of scholars who seem to have a much better idea of where they are going than I do. In fact, like Dirk Gently who believes in the fundamental interconnectedness of all things, I often find that I end up somewhere I needed to be.

One downside to this approach is the very real danger that you might end up more lost than you were to begin with. Another downside is that interesting and distracting things will lure you, Siren-like, to the rocks. I find that a trail of breadcrumbs, a ball of yarn, or any other method of finding your way back to the last place you actually recognized is essential. And I suppose, in a worst case scenario, I might even consider asking directions.

Essentially Contested Concepts


01 Aug

I first heard mention of George Lakoff at a presentation on Map Analysis at the Science, Industry, and Business Library of the New York Library so when I saw his recent book Whose Freedom in the bookstore I was intrigued enough to buy it. Lakoff presents the concept of “Essentially Contested Concepts” which was originally proposed in 1957 by W.B. Gallie.

According to Gallie, as summarized by Lakoff, “such concepts as freedom, democracy, and art are inherently subject to multiple interpretations, depending upon your values, concerns, experiences, goals and beliefs”. The essential components of an essentially contested concept are as follows;

    1. There is an uncontested core
    2. The concept must be evaluative
    3. The concept must have a complex structure (allow for variations)
    4. Has parts that are subject to variation

Lakoff goes on to explain how this accounts for very different interpretations of what “freedom” is. I started thinking about ‘essentially contested concepts’ as they relate to my current research on the Mac/Windows controversy. While computers themselves aren’t essentially contested concepts, the schism between Mac and Windows users would seem to indicate that there are basic concepts at work that have become intertwined with the Mac/Windows debate.

Looking at the various websites that answer to my google query of ‘Mac versus PC’ emotions are running high, accusations are being flung, and elements of good and evil are being raised. What essentially contested concept might engender such acrimony? Is it ‘individuality’? the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? freedom of expression?

I will explore this in greater detail as I develop this line of thought.

netorio.us

Making Persistent History One Post At a Time


Login